Welcome
back to another episode of Lost in the Farmer’s Market, due to college work
load, and the extra time needed to pull information for this post it was
significantly delayed. Due to length the post was broken into two parts with
the second half to be posted this weekend. The topic is a bit more serious then
is generally covered, as I am posting about food security. The first half is an
introduction to it and the second half is about the things you personally can
do to achieve some measure of food security on a local level. As they say with
politics, all politics are local politics and thus in the case of food security
it all centers on the local regions. Before we get to the discussion of food security I have a few pictures from the feild you might like.
This is the dark color that 'Red Giant' Mustard turns when exposed to regular cold temperatures. |
Black pearl peppers are quite striking with their black-marble shaped fruit and dark foliage which is quite striking against the light foliage of another plant such as artemesia. |
A large cotton plant can be quite showy even without the visible presence of cotton bolls. |
The calyx of a cotton plant's flower before the flower even opens. |
I see these large green garden spiders all the time in North Carolina, this one was protecting it's brood between the branches of a Lantana plant. |
While
considering the issues we face today I would say that food security is likely
one of our biggest weaknesses. The issue is corporate agriculture where
absolute profit is the driving motivation, instead of good land stewardship with
profit as a secondary motive. It is rare outside of certain limited magazine
publications that this topic is ever discussed in any detail and rarer still to
have the topic handled by anyone who is an actual expert on the topic with
supporting credentials. The lack of discussion leaves one to try and piece the
data together themselves, which can lead to confusion on the topic. I think we
can all remember how in the 1990's not everyone was entirely sure what the word
'organic' was precisely supposed to mean.
The
term 'Food Security' can be referred to in several differing definitions.
According to the World Health Organization it has three aspects, food
availability, food access and food use. The former of the three is simply
having sufficient quantities of food on a consistent basis. The second of the
three, food access is having the resources (economic and physical) to obtain
appropriate foods for a nutritious diet. The latter of the three parts is is
the correct use of food based upon information of basic nutrition and care as
well as access to clean water and sanitation facilities. The Food and Agriculture Organization goes as
far as to add a fourth part to the three parts proposed by the WHO. The fourth
part to food security is Food Stability which refers to the other three parts
but over a time rather then immediately.
For
the purposes of this post I'm more or less referring to the fourth definition
with an addition; that is, part of our problem is that currently the United States
is a monoculture sort of producer. That is we produce a whole lot of a few
things that are massed in one place and in doing so attract greater problems
such as pests and weeds with chemical resistance. But at the same time due to
agribusiness's business model we have chemical runoff into waterways and
polluted soils not to mention what gets back to the consumer on and inside the
produce. Consider that the average head of lettuce from a major producer may
travel hundreds of miles to get to a warehouse before it gets to the market,
where you can buy it. Since this is the case you must consider then that all it
takes to cripple the system is a critical failing of infrastructure, major
natural storm (hurricane sandy, Katrina and Andrew), some major fuel shortage
or worse a new strain of disease or pest to cripple the food supply system.
Also it is important to note that someone with sufficient ambition and
malicious intent could conceivably damage the digital system that keeps our
transportation system running.
We
simply do not talk about food security enough these days, especially in the
light of the limits of our own food system in the USA. For instance did you know that
there are roughly 7,000 food plants that are safe for human consumption and of
those only about 140 are grown in any real quantity? Out of those 140 we
expressly rely on only 12, but in America the top five agricultural
products aren't what you would think. As for America's top five products are
Corn, Cattle (beef), Cow's Milk, Chicken Meat, and Soybeans in that order. With
the aforementioned facts* in mind, one has to ask, we rely on 12 food crops,
the agricultural plant products in the USA that are produced the most are corn,
soy and wheat all of which have been extensively genetically modified and may
have lingering health effects on the population. Not to mention these 'super
crops' also require more chemical intervention to get a successful product and
they are implicated in disrupting local biodiversity. With all that said
perhaps there is in fact a fifth facet to food security, ‘Product Integrity’.
Knowing what you are to eat and having accurate information to make the choices
that benefit your own health in the way you wish it to.
To
summarize, Food security isn't a national thing, it is a world wide thing, but
we America
seem to want to ignore it. It is almost as if we as a people are afraid of
having to do things differently much less to have the conversation. Ironically fuel
security is talked to death, as is national security, however if you have a
nation of starving people those other two stop being relevant.
*All
numerical information in this post was pulled from three sources, The World
Health Organization, the United States Department of Agriculture and the Food
and Agriculture Organization’s respective web sites.
No comments:
Post a Comment